By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Accept

CLOSING 
THE AI-GAP
FOR FILM PRODUCTION

Everyone remembers the digital gap — the divide between those who adapted and those who didn't. The AI gap is doing the same thing, right now, in film production. I help producers cross it.
Instead of: Develop  → Shoot → Hope it works
We do: Develop → Simulate → Test → Refine → Shoot
Would you like to watch your film before you spend the budget? I call it Storyboarding on Steroids — a near-film prototype you can watch, test with real audiences, and refine before spending a single day on set.

SCHEDULE A MEETING
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
AI Generated Avatar talking about technology
WORKED WITH
AI SMART DEVELOPMENT
AND PREP

Film production is still built on a high-risk model: Develop  → Shoot → Edit → Hope it works

I change that to the Optimized model: Develop → Simulate → Test → Iterate → Validate → Shoot → Succeed

‍Before you commit to production budgets, I help you build a near-film prototype — one you can actually watch, test, and refine.

AI TOOLS 
INTRODUCTION

This is not a software platform. This is not automation replacing creative judgment. This is not predictive black-box algorithms making decisions.
‍
I lead your team through a structured workshop process. AI is used only to lower execution cost — never to replace creative thinking.
You remain the decisionmaker.
I build the testing environment.

AI FANDOM
BUILDING

While the film is being simulated, we build demand in parallel. Not by defining a “target demographic” on paper. By testing real audience response and building fandom. We:
• Identify where your real audience actually spends time
• Release targeted AI-assisted micro-content
• Test hooks, themes, tone, and positioning
• Observe reactions and  engagement
• Refine messaging based on real data.

MEMBER OF, PARTNER & ALUMNI

Maciej Żemojcin

AI FILM TECHNOLOGY CREATIVE ADVISOR

With over 20 years of experience, I speak both languages — film and technology. I don't just understand both worlds — I translate between them, turning complex AI capabilities into practical, controlled creative processes for producers.
‍
I'm a pioneer in the practical application of AI tools in industry-level film productions. I've worked with leading organizations including EAVE, ACE Producers, European Film Academy and European Producers Club.
‍
On the non-commercial side of my work, I am the initiator of the "Picture from Auschwitz" project — creating the world's first Certified Virtual Film Location of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial.

full bio

FAQs

How to optimize film production using AI tools?

Film production still runs on a speculative model:
Develop  → Shoot → Edit → Hope it works
The problem is structural. You only discover weaknesses after you've spent the money. I turn it into optimized model:
Develop → Simulate → Test → Iterate → Validate  → Shoot → Succeed
I work with producers during development to build a near-film prototype — not script coverage, not theory, not market guesswork — but a dynamic cinematic simulation of the film.
We test tone, pacing, emotional arcs, alternate story directions. We stress-test key scenes. We adjust before decisions become irreversible.
This isn’t AI replacing creativity. I lead a structured workshop process. AI is only used to reduce execution cost. Creative judgment stays with the you as producer and your team.

Is AI going to make the film not copyrightable?

I build the testing environment and you still shoot your film, so all the normal copyright lagal rules apply and your IP remains safe.
This is not a software platform. This is not automation replacing creative judgment. This is not predictive black-box algorithms making decisions.
I lead your team through a structured workshop process. AI is used only to lower execution cost — never to replace creative thinking.
You remain the decision maker and producer.

I need creative freedom, why to use this strict technological path?

I absolutely agree. I'm trying to give even more creative freedom to the team. I relocate trial and error from the expensive production stage to the inexpensive development stage.

Creativity Needs Freedom — Not Financial Pressure. Creative work requires exploration to find what you really like. You can play without strict boundaries. The problem isn’t experimentation.
The problem is in which production stage it happens.

You keep creative freedom — without carrying production-level risk.

How do you I test the audience without the film?

I want to build the value of IP of your film. That's why we prototype the Audience. While the film is being simulated, we build demand in parallel.
Not by defining a “target demographic” on paper. By testing real audience response and building fandom. We:
• Identify where your real audience actually spends time
• Release targeted AI-assisted micro-content
• Test hooks, themes, tone, and positioning
• Measure engagement and response
• Refine messaging based on real data
• We build your fandom
We don’t imagine a target audience.
We observe who responds to actual content and why.

How much does it cost?

I work as an independent technology and creative advisor. There is no agency overhead — you work directly with me.

Projects can start from €2,500 for a focused workshop, including preparation and analysis. My daily rate starts at €500 per day. The final budget depends on the scope, complexity, and level of involvement required. In practice cost savings generated exceed multiple times my fee. You could say I work almost for free — because my contribution pays for itself.

For me, success is measured by producer's satisfaction and savings but also by the impact on the final audience. If the work strengthens both — we have done it right.

Would you summarize what you do?

Film production is still a high-risk gamble.
You develop, finance, shoot, edit — and only then discover what doesn’t work.
I change that.
Before you commit to production budgets, I help you build a cinematic prototype of your film — something you can actually watch, test, stress-test, and refine.
We move trial and error out of the expensive stage and into development — where mistakes are affordable.
By the time you shoot, creative direction is validated, positioning is tested, and audience demand is already building.
Production becomes execution — not discovery.

Can you share examples of your work?

Because film development cycles often span a year or more, much of my recent work is either under NDA or has been surpassed by the rapid evolution of AI tools. In this field, a project from just twelve months ago can already feel technically outdated.
‍
To provide a transparent benchmark of my current workflow, I created an experimental "AI-Prototype": a reinterpretation of The Lord of the Rings trailer. Using the original footage as a canvas, I restyled 94 shots in just seven days to stress-test the tools and gauge audience reactions.
‍
The project v.0.1 proved to be highly polarizing. However I have done v.0.2 and the intense feedback sparked on social media has led to invaluable discussions with a real audience, providing crucial insights into the future of AI-prototyping in professional filmmaking.

For more work samples please DM.